Just a sampling of my gaming adventures...
your opinions on it...
Published on April 23, 2009 By Tekkor In Demigod

Im just curious on what everyone elses opinion is on the comment Brad made in the video yesterday about adding a feature where even on a Pantheon game people could join as a team with thier friends to play?

Me personally I dont like that idea at all. Yeah its fine for custom games or for Skirmish games even. But the Pantheon games should be a good playing field for everyone. Not a setup where 4 guys who are pro's can hammer 4 random matchmaking guys into the ground 5 games a day to inflate thier rankings.

I also see the possibilty of arranged game exploit possibly happening if guys figure it out. As it is right now its impossible as you join and its just luck of the draw to a certain extent which is how it should be at least for the Pantheon games in my opinion. 

Just my opinion on thinking of it at first thought.

 

 


Comments (Page 3)
7 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Apr 23, 2009

ddd888

Quoting Polynomial, reply 19
Red Alert 3 is way more of a 1v1 game than Demigod is. Demigod is a team game.

 

 

yep

 

Once again....nobody is talking about 1 vs. 1

 

on Apr 23, 2009

neither am i

on Apr 23, 2009

im not going read through all the post but Parth needs a the ability for team joining, its very frustrating to play with complete noobs

and just b/c u can make teams doesnt it mean it will be unfair, teams qwould only be matchse up with eachother, if you have ever played COH u know what im talking about...

on Apr 23, 2009

Azrailx
im not going read through all the post but Parth needs a the ability for team joining, its very frustrating to play with complete noobs

and just b/c u can make teams doesnt it mean it will be unfair, teams qwould only be matchse up with eachother, if you have ever played COH u know what im talking about...

 

Yep thats basically what the discussion has been to save you the reading lol.

The fact is that everyone does want an ability to join as a team....but that those "premade" teams will be matched against other "premade" teams and not against the random teams. You can have all the results on the same Pantheon rankings which is fine. Just dont have it so these perfect or pro teams are matched against random teams.

 

on Apr 23, 2009

My problem with this argument is you're wanting to make a competitive game less competitive. You're allowing options that essentially will make games easier than others. What do you expect Stardock to do when they want to hold tournaments? Hold separate tournaments for all the separate ladders? Its not feasible. That's the problem here.

on Apr 23, 2009

@Enternal.. what the hell r u talking about...any ladder that is gonna pickup this game is going to be 2v2 3v3 or 4v4/5v5... any competitive. ladder.. one way to get better is to play better players.. and the pantheon should only match you up with a buncha randoms.. it does sound super carebareish..this  is a competetive team game.. and pantheon with friends is pointless?? and will cause there playerbase to fail??? well im sure sd's not worred since 75% of the ppl who wanna play this r looking for something new/updated do.. so were not going anywhere.. but all u idiots who bought this multiplayer game to play singleplayer.. and against stupid bots.. welll were sad to see u go = / but i highly doubt that many people will be walking out the door anyhoo..and playing 3 friends in vent.. ya its awesome.. its especially hilarous when you make 1 leave and they all follow.. easy win free favor..PS doesn't the pantheon auto match you depending on a  certain skill.. so what's there to worry about even with all randoms.. they'll be equally matched in skill?? if your that worrired about your precious RANDOM insant combat by urself go play skirshmish for that .. the rest of the people who have friends and want this game to go into competitive ladders will keep hoping for some sort of team game...

on Apr 23, 2009

Polynomial
My problem with this argument is you're wanting to make a competitive game less competitive. You're allowing options that essentially will make games easier than others. What do you expect Stardock to do when they want to hold tournaments? Hold separate tournaments for all the separate ladders? Its not feasible. That's the problem here.

So by matching premade teams with random teams that makes it more competitive? Please explain. 

Also you think its beyond Stadock/GPG ability to create custom games for teams to join for a tournament and log the results? Hmm I would think they should be able to handle that...what do you think they will do for a tournament anyway? They will in some way have matches with premade game regardless for things like that. This effects that in no way. Its completely unrelated.

 

on Apr 23, 2009

To add Poly.....no Tournaments will be premade teams only. Thats fine. I dont expect them to hold a tournament for random teams. Your a bit off topic there. This issue of the Pantheon persistent tournament is a totally unrelated topic to special tournament events.

 

on Apr 23, 2009

+1 for teams, besides teams can more or less join right now since you can see who you are connecting to with the connection info button. Just keep trying until you see some of your buddies connecting.

on Apr 23, 2009

Polynomial
This sounds very carebearish. You cannot cater to everyone. Having separate systems decreases the matchup frequency.

 

Honestly I think you're panicking over nothing, as long as connectivity doesn't eleminate large chunks of the player base from each other in the future, there'll be enough of arranged teams out there to go around. Most arranged teams play at "peak" game times since it's hard to arrange any group of people to play in the day orin the early morning. If it's really an issue the system can always be tweaked to start searching random teams if absololutely no arranged teams come up in 10 minutes searching.

 

Keeping the matchmaking like-for-like helps both sides, most people I know who'd play actually in an arranged team wouldn't like to be constantly faced up with random teams who can't put up a fight and only occasionally get to face up against other arranged teams, they're more patient than average to boot. Those few I know who unfortunately would enjoy steamrolling random teams also enjoy trash talking, bitching when they loose and are generally prats.

 

Yes there's examples of mixed match making out there like red alert but there's also examples of split match making that work better like warcraft 3. Dawn of war 2's mixed team ranked gets plenty of abuse for being mixed, and that's more of a team game than red alert ever will be.

on Apr 23, 2009

There should be a Clan pantheon, for people to form organized teams. The players would earn points for their clan instead of a particular side, and so they could use any Demigod.

on Apr 23, 2009

XplosivMenace
@Enternal.. what the hell r u talking about...any ladder that is gonna pickup this game is going to be 2v2 3v3 or 4v4/5v5... any competitive. ladder.. one way to get better is to play better players.. and the pantheon should only match you up with a buncha randoms.. it does sound super carebareish..this  is a competetive team game.. and pantheon with friends is pointless?? and will cause there playerbase to fail??? well im sure sd's not worred since 75% of the ppl who wanna play this r looking for something new/updated do.. so were not going anywhere.. but all u idiots who bought this multiplayer game to play singleplayer.. and against stupid bots.. welll were sad to see u go = / but i highly doubt that many people will be walking out the door anyhoo..and playing 3 friends in vent.. ya its awesome.. its especially hilarous when you make 1 leave and they all follow.. easy win free favor..PS doesn't the pantheon auto match you depending on a  certain skill.. so what's there to worry about even with all randoms.. they'll be equally matched in skill?? if your that worrired about your precious RANDOM insant combat by urself go play skirshmish for that .. the rest of the people who have friends and want this game to go into competitive ladders will keep hoping for some sort of team game...

I'm not sure if this is directed at me and my comments or not but I take "@Enternal" to mean me as you are only one letter off.

I get your point. Competitive people want to AT and play on organized teams. That's great. I hope SD/GPD adds that feature. Hats off.

What you don't seem to respect is that there are a lot of competitive players that like to play in a random team format.

It's not hard to have an arranged team ladder and a random team ladder. Warcraft 3 has it and it works extremely well.

There's nothing "carebearish" or non-competitive about it.

When it comes down to it, SD is going to have make some choices and the criteria of that choice will come down to answering these questions:

Will it make our game more or less popular?

Will it sacrifice quality?

Do we have the programming and organization resources?

===

Having both AT and RT ladders will make the game more popular just by the very nature of offering options to more playstyles. As for quality, I don't see any plausible reason why having seperate ladders would affect quality of the game. The only real question is that of resources to maintain and support both. And that's only a question SD can answer.

on Apr 23, 2009

Don't be mistaken. I want a premade automatch system. And to be frank, the more skilled players generally do automatches in online games. Its just too convoluted to make a system where is separates premades and non premades.

You bought the wrong game if you're looking for a single player type approach here. Again, this game is clearly aimed as a team game. It needs to stay that way.

on Apr 23, 2009

Having separate systems decreases the matchup frequency.

I find this statement very interesting.

One one hand we are too believe that the core support of a game that will sustain it into the future comes from people who want to play in arranged teams because supposedly this is such a popular concept.

On the other hand we are reminded that if you had a seperate ladder for arranged teams and randoms teams that there wouldn't be enough people playing to support the arranged team ladder.

These two things are contradictory, and although espoused by the same people, don't go together in any logical way other than to say that proponents of AT really nead random players as cannon fodder.

I'm pretty sure a lot of people don't want to be cannon fodder. I can't see SD embracing this.

 

on Apr 23, 2009

Adding join as a team should be done to both Skirmish and Pantheon games...

 

BUT, when it's done they also need to make sure to improve the match making system.  It should when possible match pre-made teams with other pre-made teams.

 

Because the OP is right in the fact that a premade team will stomp a PUG team.  You don't want to ruin the fun for a PUG player who just wants to jump into a game.

7 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last